Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the C135 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C135 was manufactured 4 months later than the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the C135 grades against the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 C135 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Kodak C135

 GR Digital IV C135 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen size3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution1230k112kCrisper screen (+1118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 C135 GR Digital IV 
IntroducedJanuary 2012September 2011Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the C135 and the GR Digital IV.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and GR Digital IV.

All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The C135 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak C135 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
40
focusing manually
exports RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography features
53
weather proofing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,250)
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C135
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
31
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
fixed focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery power (390 CIPA)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
64
weather proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
good battery power (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
31
MP count decent (14MP)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
52
focusing manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
25
provides face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak C135 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Kodak EasyShare C135Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare C135 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-10 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1250 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.4" 3"
Display resolution 112 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $599