Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-6, both Waterproof cameras by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C135 was brought out 7 years prior to the WG-6 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the C135 scores vs the WG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are available at Kodak C135 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh WG-6
| C135 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Kodak C135
| WG-6 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 74 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+928k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-6
| C135 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 offers exterior dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-6 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the C135 versus the WG-6.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and WG-6 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to render more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older C135 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $271 |