Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Portability
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Kodak C135
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was revealed 3 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the C135 grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| C135 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.4" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak C135
| WG-M1 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 115k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-M1
| C135 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 features external measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C135 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the C135 and the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you might want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older C135 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak C135 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography info
megapixel count decent (14MP)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Kodak C135
Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
environment proofing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low max ISO (1,250)
environment proof
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
max ISO too low (800)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Kodak C135 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography info
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
good resolution (14MP)
environment proof
great battery pack (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Kodak C135 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography factors
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
environment proof
good resolution (14MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Kodak C135 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography highlights
megapixel count decent (14MP)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4 inch)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,250)
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
good resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proof
great battery pack (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inch)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Vlogging camera
includes face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic socket
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.4 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $2,000 |