Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
Photography Glossary Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C135 was launched 2 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the C135 grades against the HZ10W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung HZ10W
| C135 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Kodak C135
| HZ10W | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung HZ10W
| C135 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C135 provides outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the C135 vs the HZ10W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and HZ10W is 92 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and HZ10W.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Kodak C135 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern C135 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C135 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also Known as | - | WB500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 249g (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $300 |