Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Kodak C135 versus Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C135 was manufactured 3 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the C135 matches up versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung SL102
| C135 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak C135
| SL102 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.5" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung SL102
| C135 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak C135 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C135 versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the C135 vs the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and SL102.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak C135 to give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent C135 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.4" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 112k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $130 |