Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Here is a complete assessment of the Kodak C135 and Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The C135 was introduced 2 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the C135 scores versus the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung SL202

 C135 SL202 
LaunchedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak C135

 SL202 C135 
Screen size2.7"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution230k112kCrisper screen (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung SL202

 C135 SL202 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C135 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Kodak C135 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the C135 against the SL202.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C135 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and SL202.

As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Kodak C135 to provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger C135 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography highlights
34
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
25
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography information
Samsung SL202 Street photography information
53
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low maximum ISO (1,250)
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography advice
Samsung SL202 Sports photography advice
31
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
focal length is fixed (35mm)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography information
Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
64
weather proofing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 Landscape photography info
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography info
32
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.4 inches)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
27
fairly wide (28mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL202 Vlogging highlights
25
comes with face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
27
fairly wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
Photography Glossary

Kodak C135 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Samsung SL202
 Kodak EasyShare C135Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare C135 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1250 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.4" 2.7"
Display resolution 112 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 grams (0.39 pounds) 168 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $0 $140