Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe C135 was revealed 23 months later than the TL350 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the C135 grades versus the TL350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are available at Kodak C135 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung TL350
| C135 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Kodak C135
| TL350 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 112k | Sharper screen (+808k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung TL350
| C135 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the C135 compared to the TL350.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The visual underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and TL350.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Kodak C135 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer C135 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $400 |