Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
88 Imaging
33 Features
54 Overall
41
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak C135 versus Samsung TL500, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the C135 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was introduced 19 months after the TL500 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the C135 grades versus the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung TL500
| C135 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | July 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Kodak C135
| TL500 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 112k | Crisper screen (+502k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung TL500
| C135 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C135 enjoys physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C135 versus Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the C135 vs the TL500.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and TL500 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and TL500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C135 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Kodak C135 will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The newer C135 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C135 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung TL500 |
| Alternative name | - | EX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 112k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $527 |