Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C135 was launched 24 months prior to the WB35F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the C135 matches up versus the WB35F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung WB35F

 C135 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Kodak C135

 WB35F C135 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2012More modern by 24 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen dimension2.7"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution230k112kSharper screen (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung WB35F

 C135 WB35F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 enjoys physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the C135 compared to the WB35F.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C135 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and WB35F.

Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged C135 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
33
resolution is good (14MP)
includes face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography factors
Samsung WB35F Street photography factors
53
weather sealing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low maximum ISO (1,250)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
31
resolution is good (14MP)
weather sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak C135
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
64
weather sealing
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than others (194 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
31
resolution is good (14MP)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
43
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak C135
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
25
includes face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
31
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Samsung WB35F
 Kodak EasyShare C135Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Samsung WB35F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-01-10 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1250 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.4 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 112k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $130