Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was unveiled 12 months prior to the WB800F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the C135 grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung WB800F
| C135 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak C135
| WB800F | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 112k | Sharper display (+348k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung WB800F
| C135 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak C135 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the C135 vs the WB800F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older C135 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $300 |