Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The C135 was unveiled 12 months prior to the WB800F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the C135 grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung WB800F

 C135 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak C135

 WB800F C135 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2012More recent by 12 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display dimension3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution460k112kSharper display (+348k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung WB800F

 C135 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak C135 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the C135 vs the WB800F.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older C135 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
43
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Street photography highlights
53
weather sealing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,250)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (218g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Sports photography highlights
31
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak C135
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
64
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than average (218g)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
31
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
49
has manual focus
relatively wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
25
offers face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic port
35
relatively wide (23mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (218 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Samsung WB800F
 Kodak EasyShare C135Samsung WB800F
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Samsung WB800F
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-01-10 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1250 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.4 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 112k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $0 $300