Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Kodak C140 and Olympus SH-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and SH-50 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe C140 was introduced 5 years prior to the SH-50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the C140 matches up versus the SH-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus SH-50. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus SH-50
| C140 | SH-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Kodak C140
| SH-50 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus SH-50
| C140 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys external measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-50 has sizing of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Kodak C140 and Olympus SH-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the C140 against the SH-50.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and SH-50 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and SH-50.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus SH-50 will render more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SH-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $80 | $300 |