Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
![Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C140/Kodak-C140-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The C140 was released 13 months prior to the SP-800 UZ making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the C140 matches up versus the SP-800 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
C140 | SP-800 UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Kodak C140
SP-800 UZ | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
C140 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 comes with physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C140 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the C140 against the SP-800 UZ.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and SP-800 UZ is 94 and 69 respectively.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and SP-800 UZ.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 12 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $80 | $270 |