Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus SZ-11, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and SZ-11 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and SZ-11 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe C140 was announced 3 years prior to the SZ-11 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the C140 scores versus the SZ-11 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus SZ-11. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus SZ-11
| C140 | SZ-11 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Kodak C140
| SZ-11 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus SZ-11
| C140 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Kodak C140 enjoys outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-11 has specifications of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak C140 versus Olympus SZ-11 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the C140 against the SZ-11.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and SZ-11 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and SZ-11.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus SZ-11 will result in extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C140 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus SZ-11 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $80 | $253 |