Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Kodak C140 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and 9000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C140 was released 4 months before the 9000 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the C140 scores against the 9000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus 9000

 C140 9000 

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Kodak C140

 9000 C140 

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus 9000

 C140 9000 
ReleasedJanuary 2009May 2009Same age
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display sizing
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check out the Kodak C140 and Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the C140 and the 9000.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and 9000.

As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus 9000 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography details
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
18
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak C140
Street photography with Olympus 9000
46
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
low maximum ISO (1,000)
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
15
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak C140
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
50
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
58
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (225g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 Landscape photography features
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography features
21
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging information
Olympus 9000 Vlogging information
21
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak C140 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Olympus 9000
 Kodak EasyShare C140Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Olympus Stylus 9000
Otherwise known as - mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1000 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance 13cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160g (0.35 lb) 225g (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $80 $300