Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10
94 Imaging
30 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was announced 5 years before the XZ-10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the C140 matches up vs the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus XZ-10
| C140 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Kodak C140
| XZ-10 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus XZ-10
| C140 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 comes with outside measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the C140 vs the XZ-10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and XZ-10 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and XZ-10.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The C140 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus XZ-10 will provide greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older C140 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $80 | $428 |