Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was introduced 4 years earlier than the TG-320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the C140 matches up against the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-320
| C140 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak C140
| TG-320 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-320
| C140 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Kodak C140 offers outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and TG-320.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The C140 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-320 will provide you with more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older C140 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $80 | $0 |