Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-610, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-610 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was introduced 24 months prior to the TG-610 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the C140 scores against the TG-610 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-610
| C140 | TG-610 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Kodak C140
| TG-610 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-610
| C140 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 comes with outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-610 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the C140 vs the TG-610.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-610 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and TG-610.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-610 will offer more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $80 | $223 |