Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C140 was unveiled 5 years before the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the C140 matches up against the TG-630 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| C140 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Kodak C140
| TG-630 iHS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| C140 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 offers physical dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the C140 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and TG-630 iHS is 94 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will result in extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $80 | $200 |