Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-810 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was launched 3 years earlier than the TG-810 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the C140 grades against the TG-810 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus TG-810. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-810
| C140 | TG-810 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Kodak C140
| TG-810 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-810
| C140 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 comes with external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the C140 versus the TG-810.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and TG-810 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and TG-810.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-810 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $80 | $428 |