Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we are matching up the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C140 was introduced 5 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the C140 matches up vs the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| C140 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Kodak C140
| TG-830 iHS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| C140 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 comes with outside measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the C140 and the TG-830 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and TG-830 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will show more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older C140 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $80 | $0 |