Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C140 was brought out 5 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the C140 grades vs the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| C140 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Kodak C140
| TG-2 iHS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| C140 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys exterior measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the C140 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-2 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The graphic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $80 | $380 |