Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe C140 was manufactured 6 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the C140 matches up against the TG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-3
| C140 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Kodak C140
| TG-3 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-3
| C140 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 enjoys outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the C140 vs the TG-3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and TG-3.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The C140 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will offer you more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $80 | $350 |
