Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-4 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe C140 was revealed 7 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the C140 matches up vs the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-4
| C140 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Kodak C140
| TG-4 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 76 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-4
| C140 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak C140 features exterior measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the C140 against the TG-4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and TG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and TG-4.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The C140 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $80 | $379 |