Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VH-515, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and VH-515 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe C140 was manufactured 4 years before the VH-515 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the C140 scores against the VH-515 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus VH-515
| C140 | VH-515 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Kodak C140
| VH-515 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 44 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus VH-515
| C140 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the C140 vs the VH-515.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and VH-515 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and VH-515.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The C140 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus VH-515 will show greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older C140 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $80 | $648 |