Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and VR-320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was revealed 3 years prior to the VR-320 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the C140 scores against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus VR-320
| C140 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak C140
| VR-320 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus VR-320
| C140 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the C140 against the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and VR-320.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $80 | $179 |