Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and VR-330 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C140 was introduced 3 years prior to the VR-330 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the C140 scores vs the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus VR-330
| C140 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak C140
| VR-330 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus VR-330
| C140 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 offers exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the C140 versus the VR-330.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and VR-330.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will resolve extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $80 | $220 |