Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe C140 was introduced 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the C140 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C140 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak C140
XZ-2 iHS | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C140 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the C140 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $80 | $450 |