Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
![Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C140/Kodak-C140-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ28/Panasonic-FZ28-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 417g - 118 x 75 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Overview
Lets look closer at the Kodak C140 versus Panasonic FZ28, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the FZ28 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the C140 (1/2.5") and FZ28 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The C140 was released about the same time to the FZ28 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the C140 grades against the FZ28 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery and Panasonic FZ28 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Panasonic FZ28
C140 | FZ28 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ28 over the Kodak C140
FZ28 | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Panasonic FZ28
C140 | FZ28 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ28 has sizing of 118mm x 75mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 417 grams (0.92 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C140 versus Panasonic FZ28 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the C140 vs the FZ28.
![Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 size comparison Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ28-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and FZ28 is 94 and 72 respectively.
![Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 top view buttons comparison Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ28-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and FZ28.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic FZ28 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
![Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 sensor size comparison Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ28-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ28-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic FZ28 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps, 848 x 480, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 @ 30fps, 320 x 240 @ 10fps |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 417 grams (0.92 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 118 x 75 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 27 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 17.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 79 |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $80 | $599 |