Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and ZS35 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe C140 was introduced 6 years prior to the ZS35 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the C140 grades versus the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Panasonic ZS35
| C140 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Kodak C140
| ZS35 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2009 | More modern by 60 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Panasonic ZS35
| C140 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the C140 versus the ZS35.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and ZS35 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and ZS35.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic ZS35 will offer you greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $80 | $300 |