Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50
94 Imaging
30 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS45
- Updated by Panasonic ZS60
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak C140 versus Panasonic ZS50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and ZS50 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was revealed 7 years prior to the ZS50 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the C140 scores against the ZS50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Panasonic ZS50
| C140 | ZS50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Kodak C140
| ZS50 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 | January 2009 | More modern by 72 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Panasonic ZS50
| C140 | ZS50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 offers external measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Kodak C140 versus Panasonic ZS50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the C140 and the ZS50.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and ZS50 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and ZS50.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS50 will give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 243 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $80 | $350 |