Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C140 was announced 4 years before the WG-2 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the C140 matches up versus the WG-2 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| C140 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Kodak C140
| WG-2 GPS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| C140 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 enjoys outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the C140 versus the WG-2 GPS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WG-2 GPS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and WG-2 GPS.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will offer you greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $80 | $300 |