Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C140 was introduced 5 years prior to the WG-3 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the C140 matches up against the WG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Pentax WG-3
| C140 | WG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Kodak C140
| WG-3 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 55 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Pentax WG-3
| C140 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 enjoys outer measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the C140 vs the WG-3.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and WG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and WG-3.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Pentax WG-3 will offer you more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak C140 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $80 | $300 |