Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the C140 (1/2.5") and CX4 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The C140 was unveiled 19 months before the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the C140 scores versus the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh CX4

 C140 CX4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Kodak C140

 CX4 C140 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2009Newer by 19 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX4

 C140 CX4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 enjoys outer measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the C140 and the CX4.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and CX4 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and CX4.

Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C140 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh CX4 will provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
18
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
27
has manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
46
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
max ISO too low (1,000)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
15
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography factors
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
low megapixels (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
66
lighter than average (205g)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C140
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX4
21
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging highlights
21
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
30
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX4
 Kodak EasyShare C140Ricoh CX4
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Ricoh CX4
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-01-08 2010-08-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 13cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160g (0.35 pounds) 205g (0.45 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $80 $211