Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively similar but the C140 (1/2.5") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was launched 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the C140 scores against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| C140 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Kodak C140
| GR Digital IV | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| C140 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 offers outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and GR Digital IV.
To sum up, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 390 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $80 | $599 |