Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-20 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-20 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the C140 matches up against the WG-20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh WG-20. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-20
| C140 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Kodak C140
| WG-20 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-20
| C140 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 has got outer measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the C140 against the WG-20.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WG-20 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The pic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and WG-20.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-20 will deliver greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $80 | $370 |