Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-30W (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-30W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C140 was released 6 years prior to the WG-30W which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the C140 grades vs the WG-30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| C140 | WG-30W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Kodak C140
| WG-30W | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 70 months |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30W
| C140 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 comes with external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the C140 vs the WG-30W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and WG-30W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-30W.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-30W will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $80 | $280 |