Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C140 was announced 6 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the C140 scores vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| C140 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Kodak C140
| WG-4 GPS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| C140 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the C140 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The C140 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will deliver greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $80 | $210 |
