Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Newer Model is Ricoh WG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The C140 was announced 7 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the C140 scores vs the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 C140 WG-5 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Kodak C140

 WG-5 GPS C140 
ReleasedFebruary 2015January 2009More recent by 74 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 C140 WG-5 GPS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 has outer measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the C140 against the WG-5 GPS.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WG-5 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and WG-5 GPS.

Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The C140 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will give extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography highlights
18
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low MP (8 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
41
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography info
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography info
46
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
maximum ISO low (1,000)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (236 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C140
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
15
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect autofocus
48
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Travel photography information
50
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (8MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
69
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 shots)
heavier than competitors in class (236 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C140
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
21
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
54
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery (240 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Vlogging advice
21
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic support
heavier than competitors in class (236g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
 Kodak EasyShare C140Ricoh WG-5 GPS
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2009-01-08 2015-02-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 6400
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 13cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 10.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 grams (0.35 lbs) 236 grams (0.52 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $80 $500