Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-70 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was brought out 12 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the C140 scores versus the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-70
| C140 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Kodak C140
| WG-70 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 134 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-70
| C140 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 has got outer measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the C140 vs the WG-70.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and WG-70.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-70 will show greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older C140 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $80 | $280 |