Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Kodak C140 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was revealed 17 months before the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the C140 scores vs the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung HZ35W
| C140 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Kodak C140
| HZ35W | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung HZ35W
| C140 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 offers physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Kodak C140 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the C140 and the HZ35W.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung HZ35W will result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak C140 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $80 | $300 |