Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Kodak C140 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the C140 (1/2.5") and SL202 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The C140 was released within a month of the SL202 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the C140 grades versus the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung SL202

 C140 SL202 

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak C140

 SL202 C140 

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung SL202

 C140 SL202 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009February 2009Same generation
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 has outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Kodak C140 versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the C140 compared to the SL202.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and SL202 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and SL202.

All in all, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C140 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Samsung SL202 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography factors
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography factors
18
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
25
features face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography features
Samsung SL202 Street photography features
46
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C140
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
15
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography details
Samsung SL202 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C140
Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
21
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
27
fairly wide (28mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak C140
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
21
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
27
fairly wide (28mm)
features face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Samsung SL202
 Kodak EasyShare C140Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare C140 Samsung SL202
Otherwise known as - PL50
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-08 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1000 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 13cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 160 gr (0.35 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $80 $140