Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
42
Overall
39

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WB150F (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The C140 was released 4 years earlier than the WB150F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the C140 matches up vs the WB150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung WB150F

 C140 WB150F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Kodak C140

 WB150F C140 
LaunchedJanuary 2012January 2009Newer by 36 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung WB150F

 C140 WB150F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the C140 compared to the WB150F.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WB150F.

To sum up, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB150F will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography information
18
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
42
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
provides face detection focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak C140
Street photography with Samsung WB150F
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (188g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C140
Sports photography with Samsung WB150F
15
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
52
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography details
Samsung WB150F Travel photography details
50
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
69
lighter than competitors (188g)
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography highlights
21
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
49
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging info
Samsung WB150F Vlogging info
21
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic port
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competitors (188g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Samsung WB150F
 Kodak EasyShare C140Samsung WB150F
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Samsung WB150F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-01-08 2012-01-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 13cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160g (0.35 pounds) 188g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $80 $230