Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WB30F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C140 was announced 5 years before the WB30F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the C140 matches up vs the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung WB30F
| C140 | WB30F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Kodak C140
| WB30F | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung WB30F
| C140 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 features outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the C140 against the WB30F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung WB30F will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | - |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 128 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $80 | $180 |