Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WB30F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The C140 was announced 5 years before the WB30F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the C140 matches up vs the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung WB30F

 C140 WB30F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Kodak C140

 WB30F C140 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2009Newer by 48 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung WB30F

 C140 WB30F 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 features outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the C140 against the WB30F.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and WB30F.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung WB30F will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography advice
18
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW support
34
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography advice
Samsung WB30F Street photography advice
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW support
low max ISO (1,000)
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (128 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Sports photography highlights
15
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB30F Travel photography advice
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
69
lighter than competition (128 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography advice
21
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
43
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB30F Vlogging highlights
21
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (128 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Samsung WB30F
 Kodak EasyShare C140Samsung WB30F
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare C140 Samsung WB30F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 13cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 160 gr (0.35 lb) 128 gr (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $80 $180