Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
![Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C140/Kodak-C140-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000/Sony-S2000-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Kodak C140 versus Sony S2000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is fairly close but the C140 (1/2.5") and S2000 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The C140 was launched 12 months prior to the S2000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the C140 scores vs the S2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Sony S2000
C140 | S2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Kodak C140
S2000 | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Sony S2000
C140 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 comes with external measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C140 versus Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the C140 against the S2000.
![Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 size comparison Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and S2000 is 94 and 93 respectively.
![Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and S2000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The C140 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony S2000 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older C140 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
![Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 13cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $80 | $225 |