Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both offered by Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and M575 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and M575 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was revealed 12 months before the M575 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the M320 matches up versus the M575 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak M575

 M320 M575 

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Kodak M320

 M575 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2009Newer by 12 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak M575

 M320 M575 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 offers external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has proportions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the M320 versus the M575.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and M575.

To sum up, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Kodak M575 will produce more detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography info
Kodak M575 Street photography info
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others (155g)
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Kodak M575
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Kodak M575
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (155g)
low resolution sensor (9MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
68
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (152g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography information
Kodak M575 Landscape photography information
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
40
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging information
Kodak M575 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic jack
heavier than others (155g)
28
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (152g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Kodak M575
 Kodak EasyShare M320Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Kodak
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2010-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1000
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lbs) 152 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $39 $139