Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Mini front
Portability
97
Imaging
32
Features
13
Overall
24

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak Mini
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Mini, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are built by Kodak. The image resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the Mini (10MP) is pretty close but the M320 (1/2.5") and Mini (1/3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M320 was revealed 24 months earlier than the Mini which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M320 grades against the Mini in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak Mini

 M320 Mini 
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Kodak M320

 Mini M320 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak Mini

 M320 Mini 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 offers outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak Mini has specifications of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Mini in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the M320 versus the Mini.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and Mini is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and Mini.

Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Kodak Mini will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Kodak Mini
19
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
24
supports face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Kodak Mini
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
heavier than average (155g)
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/3")
does not have RAW format
max ISO too low (1,000)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Kodak Mini Sports photography highlights
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Mini as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (155 grams)
megapixel count low (9MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Kodak Mini Landscape photography features
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
22
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Kodak Mini
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than average (155g)
25
supports face detection focusing
wide angle not fantastic (29mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Kodak Mini
 Kodak EasyShare M320Kodak EasyShare Mini
General Information
Brand Kodak Kodak
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare Mini
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 3640 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 1000
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 29-87mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 7.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 99g (0.22 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $39 $100