Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b01ea/b01eaeed3344757bf3c3addea44dbc596dcfee8a" alt="Kodak EasyShare M320 front Kodak EasyShare M320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad2af/ad2af40ed0b0d3953f6a38a31c1019978cfbade9" alt="Kodak EasyShare Mini front Kodak EasyShare Mini front"
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Mini, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are built by Kodak. The image resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the Mini (10MP) is pretty close but the M320 (1/2.5") and Mini (1/3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The M320 was revealed 24 months earlier than the Mini which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M320 grades against the Mini in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Kodak EasyShare Mini. The full galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Kodak Mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak Mini
M320 | Mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Kodak M320
Mini | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak Mini
M320 | Mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 offers outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak Mini has specifications of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Mini in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the M320 versus the Mini.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad89b/ad89bffef267caa202a2bb47b2d7347867d164ed" alt="Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini size comparison Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and Mini is 95 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241d2/241d22c0b361e7d2265d2634abd08c54fbcd4cf8" alt="Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini top view buttons comparison Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and Mini.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Kodak Mini will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afaa6/afaa6f12169c6d5930225523f0dec94f6087bc36" alt="Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini sensor size comparison Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini sensor size comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2996e/2996e16eb279a1e0d6f40b8f2626d45725145291" alt="Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Kodak Mini Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Kodak EasyShare Mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Kodak |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Kodak EasyShare Mini |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3640 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 29-87mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.0-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 99g (0.22 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $39 | $100 |