Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Overview

Following is a extensive overview of the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both are created by Kodak. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and Touch (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and Touch (1/3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M320 was unveiled 24 months prior to the Touch which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the M320 grades against the Touch in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak Touch

 M320 Touch 

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Kodak M320

 Touch M320 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak Touch

 M320 Touch 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 has outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak Touch has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Kodak Touch in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M320 vs the Touch.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and Touch is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and Touch.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Kodak Touch will offer you extra detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography advice
Kodak Touch Portrait photography advice
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (150 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Kodak Touch
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Kodak Touch Travel photography advice
50
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (155g)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
68
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (150g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Kodak Touch
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
42
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Kodak Touch Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
31
rather wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
offers face detection focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (150g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M320 vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Kodak Touch
 Kodak EasyShare M320Kodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Company Kodak Kodak
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare Touch
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 7.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 150 gr (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $39 $100