Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Kodak M590 front
Portability
99
Imaging
36
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak M590
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Kodak M320 versus Kodak M590, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are sold by Kodak. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and M590 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and M590 (1/3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M320 was launched 19 months prior to the M590 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the M320 grades versus the M590 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak M590

 M320 M590 
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Kodak M320

 M590 M320 
RevealedAugust 2010January 2009More modern by 19 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak M590

 M320 M590 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has got external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M590 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Kodak M590 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the M320 versus the M590.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and M590 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and M590.

All in all, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Kodak M590 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M590 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
29
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M590 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition (155g)
59
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Kodak M590 Sports photography factors
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
sensor is very small (1/3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M590 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
low megapixels (9MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography information
Kodak M590 Landscape photography information
22
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
39
fast max aperture (f)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
sensor is very small (1/3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
Kodak M590 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone support
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
31
fast max aperture (f)
image stabilization (Optical)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M590 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Kodak M590
 Kodak EasyShare M320Kodak M590
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Kodak
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak M590
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2010-08-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3242
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 7.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) -
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $39 $120