Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix A10 front
Portability
94
Imaging
41
Features
23
Overall
33

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Nikon A10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 160g - 96 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released January 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and A10 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and A10 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M320 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the A10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the M320 scores versus the A10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon A10

 M320 A10 

Reasons to pick Nikon A10 over the Kodak M320

 A10 M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2016January 2009More recent by 85 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon A10

 M320 A10 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon A10 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the M320 compared to the A10.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and A10 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and A10.

As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M320 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Nikon A10 will offer greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography info
Nikon A10 Portrait photography info
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
36
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Nikon A10 Street photography details
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
56
image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition (160g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Nikon A10 Sports photography factors
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
37
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
low frames per second (1.2 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography features
Nikon A10 Travel photography features
50
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (155g)
low megapixels (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
62
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (160g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Nikon A10
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
39
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
Nikon A10 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition (155g)
30
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
features face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic port
heavier than competition (160g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Nikon A10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon A10
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix A10
General Information
Company Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix A10
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2016-01-14
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.2-6.5
Macro focusing distance 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 1.2fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.60 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, off, fill flash, slow sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 160 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 59 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 photos
Type of battery - AA
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $39 $90