Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S01 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
16
Overall
26

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Nikon S01
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.9" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 29-87mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 96g - 77 x 52 x 17mm
  • Revealed June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S01, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the S01 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the M320 (1/2.5") and S01 (1/2.9") provide different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M320 was brought out 5 years prior to the S01 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M320 grades vs the S01 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S01

 M320 S01 
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Nikon S01 over the Kodak M320

 S01 M320 
RevealedJune 2013January 2009More modern by 54 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S01

 M320 S01 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 enjoys exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S01 has sizing of 77mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 96 grams (0.21 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S01 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 compared to the S01.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S01 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and S01.

Clearly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon S01 will produce greater detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Nikon S01 Portrait photography details
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.9")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography features
Nikon S01 Street photography features
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
55
lighter than others (96g)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.9")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Nikon S01 Sports photography information
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.9")
terrible battery power (190 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S01 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
55
lighter than others (96g)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (190 CIPA)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (29mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Nikon S01
22
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (29mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.9")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery power (190 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Nikon S01
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
27
touchscreen capability
lighter than others (96g)
wide angle not good (29mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S01 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S01
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S01
General Information
Company Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S01
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2013-06-21
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.9"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 4.96 x 3.72mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 18.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 29-87mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 7.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 1.20 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 96g (0.21 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 77 x 52 x 17mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 190 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 Built-in
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 -
Pricing at launch $39 $170